Cosets and quotients · Definition
Normal subgroup
Before you start you need to know
Not every subgroup can be «divided out» of its group; the normal ones are those that allow it, which is where the idea of a quotient comes from.
Definition
A normal subgroup is a subgroup \(N\) of a group \(G\) that equals all of its conjugates by elements \(g\in G\).
The condition \(gNg^{-1}=N\) does not ask that each \(n\in N\) stay fixed, only that the whole set be preserved: \(gng^{-1}\) may be another element of \(N\). It is written \(N\trianglelefteq G\). It is equivalent to \(gN=Ng\) for all \(g\), that is, to left and right cosets coinciding; in general \(gN\) and \(Ng\) differ.
Some cases always work: \(\{e\}\) and \(G\) are normal; in an abelian group every subgroup is; every subgroup of index 2 is; the center is; and the kernel of any homomorphism is too (in fact every normal subgroup is the kernel of some homomorphism, as the quotient group will show). A subgroup that is the only one of its order is normal, since conjugation sends it to a subgroup of the same order.
The example worth remembering is \(S_3\): the subgroup \(A_3=\langle(1\,2\,3)\rangle\) is normal, but \(\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) is not, because conjugating by \((1\,3)\) gives \(\langle(2\,3)\rangle\). Normality is not transitive: \(N\trianglelefteq H\) and \(H\trianglelefteq G\) do not imply \(N\trianglelefteq G\), although if \(N\trianglelefteq G\) and \(N\subseteq H\), then \(N\trianglelefteq H\).
A common mistake is to confuse «normal» with «commuting element by element»: \(gNg^{-1}=N\) does not mean \(gn=ng\). That stronger condition describes the center. Also, the intersection of normal subgroups is normal, but the union of two of them is almost never even a subgroup.
Think about it
Is \(A_3\) normal in \(S_3\)? And is \(\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) normal in \(S_4\)?
\(A_3\) is, since it has index 2. \(\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) is not normal in \(S_4\): conjugating by \((1\,3)\) gives \(\langle(2\,3)\rangle\).
If we know \(gNg^{-1}\subseteq N\) for every \(g\), is that enough to conclude \(N\) is normal?
Yes: applied to \(g^{-1}\) it gives \(g^{-1}Ng\subseteq N\), and conjugating by \(g\) yields \(N\subseteq gNg^{-1}\), hence \(gNg^{-1}=N\).
Exercises 10
- Let \(G\) be an abelian group and \(N\) a subgroup of \(G\). What can be said about \(N\)?
- In \(S_3\), which of these subgroups is normal?
- In \(S_3\), with \(g=(1\,3)\), what is \(g\,(1\,2)\,g^{-1}\)?
- If \(N\) is a subgroup of \(G\) with \([G:N]=2\), what can be said?
- In \(S_3\), how many distinct subgroups of the form \(g\langle(1\,2)\rangle g^{-1}\) are there as \(g\) ranges over \(S_3\)?
- Which of these conditions is equivalent to \(N\) being a normal subgroup of \(G\)?
- Let \(H=\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) in \(S_3\). Which \(g\) shows that \(H\) is not normal?
- Let \(N\) be normal in \(G\) and \(H\) a subgroup with \(N\subseteq H\subseteq G\). What always holds?
- A subgroup \(H\) of \(G\) is the only subgroup of \(G\) with \(|H|\) elements. What follows?
- How many normal subgroups does \(S_3\) have?
What comes next
References
- David S. Dummit, Richard M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, 3rd edition, Wiley, 2004. §3.1
- Joseph A. Gallian, Contemporary Abstract Algebra, 9th edition, Cengage, 2017. cap. 9
- I. N. Herstein, Abstract Algebra, 3rd edition, Wiley, 1996. §2.6
- John B. Fraleigh, A First Course in Abstract Algebra, 7th edition, Pearson, 2002. §14