Cosets and quotients · Definition

Normal subgroup

modern algebragroups

Before you start you need to know

Not every subgroup can be «divided out» of its group; the normal ones are those that allow it, which is where the idea of a quotient comes from.

Definition

A normal subgroup is a subgroup \(N\) of a group \(G\) that equals all of its conjugates by elements \(g\in G\).

\[gNg^{-1}=N\ \ \forall g\in G\]

The condition \(gNg^{-1}=N\) does not ask that each \(n\in N\) stay fixed, only that the whole set be preserved: \(gng^{-1}\) may be another element of \(N\). It is written \(N\trianglelefteq G\). It is equivalent to \(gN=Ng\) for all \(g\), that is, to left and right cosets coinciding; in general \(gN\) and \(Ng\) differ.

Some cases always work: \(\{e\}\) and \(G\) are normal; in an abelian group every subgroup is; every subgroup of index 2 is; the center is; and the kernel of any homomorphism is too (in fact every normal subgroup is the kernel of some homomorphism, as the quotient group will show). A subgroup that is the only one of its order is normal, since conjugation sends it to a subgroup of the same order.

The example worth remembering is \(S_3\): the subgroup \(A_3=\langle(1\,2\,3)\rangle\) is normal, but \(\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) is not, because conjugating by \((1\,3)\) gives \(\langle(2\,3)\rangle\). Normality is not transitive: \(N\trianglelefteq H\) and \(H\trianglelefteq G\) do not imply \(N\trianglelefteq G\), although if \(N\trianglelefteq G\) and \(N\subseteq H\), then \(N\trianglelefteq H\).

A common mistake is to confuse «normal» with «commuting element by element»: \(gNg^{-1}=N\) does not mean \(gn=ng\). That stronger condition describes the center. Also, the intersection of normal subgroups is normal, but the union of two of them is almost never even a subgroup.

Think about it

Is \(A_3\) normal in \(S_3\)? And is \(\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) normal in \(S_4\)?

\(A_3\) is, since it has index 2. \(\langle(1\,2)\rangle\) is not normal in \(S_4\): conjugating by \((1\,3)\) gives \(\langle(2\,3)\rangle\).

If we know \(gNg^{-1}\subseteq N\) for every \(g\), is that enough to conclude \(N\) is normal?

Yes: applied to \(g^{-1}\) it gives \(g^{-1}Ng\subseteq N\), and conjugating by \(g\) yields \(N\subseteq gNg^{-1}\), hence \(gNg^{-1}=N\).

Exercises 10

References

  • David S. Dummit, Richard M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, 3rd edition, Wiley, 2004. §3.1
  • Joseph A. Gallian, Contemporary Abstract Algebra, 9th edition, Cengage, 2017. cap. 9
  • I. N. Herstein, Abstract Algebra, 3rd edition, Wiley, 1996. §2.6
  • John B. Fraleigh, A First Course in Abstract Algebra, 7th edition, Pearson, 2002. §14