Special groups · Definition
Classification of finite abelian groups
Before you start you need to know
Among finite groups, abelian ones are the only family known completely: this theorem says exactly which ones exist for each order.
Definition
Every finite abelian group \(G\) is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups \(\mathbb{Z}_{p^k}\), with \(p\) prime and \(k\ge1\), unique up to order.
For a given order \(n\), factor \(n=p_1^{a_1}\cdots p_s^{a_s}\). Every abelian group of order \(n\) splits into one component per prime, of order \(p_i^{a_i}\), and that component is a product of cyclic groups \(\mathbb{Z}_{p_i^{k}}\) whose exponents \(k\) add up to \(a_i\). Hence abelian groups of order \(p^a\) correspond one to one with the partitions of the integer \(a\), and the total for \(n\) is the product of the partition numbers of the \(a_i\).
Guiding example: for \(n=12=2^2\cdot3\) the partitions of \(2\) are \(2\) and \(1+1\), and the one of \(1\) is unique. This gives \(\mathbb{Z}_4\times\mathbb{Z}_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_{12}\) and \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_6\). If every \(a_i=1\) (squarefree order), there is only one group and it is cyclic.
Uniqueness means that two different products of this kind are never isomorphic: the list of factors \(\mathbb{Z}_{p^k}\) is determined by \(G\). A typical mistake is to believe that \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_4\) and \(\mathbb{Z}_8\) coincide because they have the same order; the first has no element of order \(8\). An equivalent presentation uses invariant factors \(d_1\mid d_2\mid\cdots\mid d_m\) with \(G\cong\mathbb{Z}_{d_1}\times\cdots\times\mathbb{Z}_{d_m}\).
The proof uses that a direct product of cyclic groups of coprime orders is cyclic (Chinese remainder theorem), and the result is the special case, for \(\mathbb{Z}\)-modules, of the structure theorem over principal ideal domains. It contrasts with non-abelian groups, for which no such simple list exists.
Think about it
Why is there no abelian group of order 12 with an element of order 8?
By Lagrange the order of an element divides the order of the group, and 8 does not divide 12. The classification confirms it: the only candidates are \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\) and \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_6\).
How can you tell \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_4\) and \(\mathbb{Z}_8\) apart without comparing all elements?
\(\mathbb{Z}_8\) is cyclic and has an element of order 8; in \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_4\) every element has order at most 4.
Exercises 10
- How many abelian groups of order \(12\) are there, up to isomorphism?
- How many abelian groups of order \(16\) are there, up to isomorphism?
- Which of these groups is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\)?
- Decompose \(\mathbb{Z}_{6}\times\mathbb{Z}_{10}\) into cyclic factors of prime-power order.
- How many abelian groups of order \(35\) are there, up to isomorphism?
- What is the largest order of an element of \(\mathbb{Z}_{4}\times\mathbb{Z}_{6}\)?
- How many abelian groups of order \(72\) are there, up to isomorphism?
- Which pair of groups is isomorphic?
- How many elements of order \(2\) does \(\mathbb{Z}_{2}\times\mathbb{Z}_{2}\times\mathbb{Z}_{4}\) have?
- Let \(G\) be an abelian group of order \(36\). Which statement is always true?
References
- David S. Dummit, Richard M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, 3rd edition, Wiley, 2004. §5.2
- Joseph A. Gallian, Contemporary Abstract Algebra, 9th edition, Cengage, 2017. cap. 11
- I. N. Herstein, Abstract Algebra, 3rd edition, Wiley, 1996. §2.14
- John B. Fraleigh, A First Course in Abstract Algebra, 7th edition, Pearson, 2002. §11